The Delhi High Court on Wednesday said that there is no copyright protection for an i🐈dea itself, however, if the "expression" of the idea is copied, it would indeed constitute copyright infringement.
A single-judge Bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh was hearing the copyright infringement dispute between two storytelling platforms -- Hum🍰ans of Bombay (HOB) and People of India (POI).
The lawsuit was initiated by HOB, which alleged that POI had been infringing on its copyrighted content. It con🦹tended that the latter had not only used identical content but had also replicated its busineꦑss model, including the stories they published.
POI argued that the plaintiff was not a unique platform and pointed out that there were other simil🍸ar platforms with similar business models. They also claimed that HOB's concept had similarities with Humans of𒐪 New York, which began in 2010.
Justice Singh recorded the plaintiff's stance that they had no objection to PO༺I operating a similar platform, as long as they refrained from copying its images.
The court stated that there should⭕ be no monopoly in the operation of a storytelling platform and urged such platforms to develop their unique creative expressions to convey and disseminate their tales.
The verdict clarified that the act of copying ident🔥ical images, literary content, and the specific approach to presenting stories would be exclusive to each platform. Moreover🔯, the court said that if photographs are commissioned or videos are produced by the two platforms, the copyright would be vested in the respective platform.
