A Special Leave Petition (SPL) has been filed in the Supreme Court on Thursday challenging a February 2020 Rajasthan High Court order that dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that appealed to stop “illegal betting and gambling activities by fantasy sports operator Dream11.” (More Cricket News)
Dream11, the largest fantasy sports operator in India, replaced Chinese mobile company Vivo as the title sponsors of Indian Premier League (IPL) 2020. Dream11, which receives💖 funding from Chinese company Tencent, is a major ally of the Indian Cricket Board (BCCI) and at least six of the eight IPL franꦆchises.
The latest SLP against Dream11 has been filed by social activist and financial consultan🍒t Avinash Meꦬhrotra. His 200-page petition says the Rajasthan High Court dismissed a PIL filed by Chandresh Sankhla on the basis of orders passed by the High Courts of Bombay, and Punjab and Haryana, that said fantasy sports are “games of skill and do not amount to gambling.” Mehrotra’s SLP wants the Supreme Court, which stayed in March a 2019 Bombay High Court Order in favour of Dream11, to be examined in depth.
READ:
It may be pertinent to note that on Thursday, the Andhra Pradesh government approved an amendment Bill to the Andhra Gaming Act, 1974. The Bill, if passed by both Houses, will mean online games like rummy and poker that involve money transactions, will be illegal in the state. The YS Jagan Mohan Reddy government argued that these online games are leading to “unhealthy tendenc꧋ies” in the society and pushing the youth on to a wrong path.
Raj Kundra happy
Among others, the Andhra Pradesh government’s decision was welcomed by Raj Kundra, the husband of actress Shilpa Shetty. Kundra once owned stakes in Rajasthan Royals, who won the IPL in its inaugural year, 2008. Royals and Chennai Super Kings were banished from the IPL for corr𒊎uption in the 2013 edition of the tournament.
“My stand on this is Real Money Gaming (RMG) needs to be ෴regulated otherwise everyone and anyone can create a company overnight using the archaic game of skill rules. It’s difficult to work in a country 🐽that has separate rules per state! One Rule One India,” Kundra said in a Twitter post.
Mehrotra’s SLP is aimed at seeking clarity on regulat🅷ions governing fantasy sports. He told Outlook, “Online gaming and gambling, where real money is involved, is a risk to society, and leads to hard earn♉ed money being lost by a lot of people. This has serious social consequences, and should not be permitted till such time proper regulations are brought into force.”
Fantas𓄧y sports involve financial transactions (or wagers) and three Indian cricket captains – MS Dhoni (Dream11), Sourav Ganguly (My11Circle) and Virat Kohli (Mobile Premier League) – currently endorse fantasy cricket in return for undisclosed fees. Dream11 is also a partner of the International Cricket Council.
Supreme Court not amused
Apart from being caught in the quagmire of “skill vs chance,” Dream11 has also been charged by a ཧpowerful trader’s body for ‘hoodwinking’ the government of no less than INR 2200 crores in indirect taxes (GST). An SLP filed by the Maharashtra government late in 2019 forced a Supreme Court bench, heade🦄d by Chief Justice of India Sharad Bobde, to stay the Bombay High Court order that had essentially given the fantasy sports operator a free run to operate across leagues.
Dream11 has used the IPL platform largely for marketing its brand and has🌟 been extremely successful. Photo - BCCI
India has evolved rapidly in the IT sector and seen an Internet boom since the turn of the century, but the laws governing online gaming remain fuzzy, incompatible with the digital revolution and therefore gullible to indiscriminate interpretation. The Public Gaming Act of 1867 remains the foundation of all Acts and Laws that govern 🍌things like gambling and betting in India. Broadly, anything that involves money and is “predominantly a game of chance” is punishable. So the best way for operators was to win court judgements that endorsed things like fantasy sports and horse racing as “predominantly a game of skill.”
Although it was rummy that was the first to win a Supreme Court sticker of legitimacy in its favour way back in 1968, the Internet di𝄹dn’t exist then and a pay-to-play online operation involving millions of subscribers was never envisioned. Between 1996 and 2017, there have been a few cases in High Courts “seeking declaration” on games like poker, housey and blackjack, but apart from giving some general protection to those who played these games privately in clubs 🦩or at social gatherings, the judiciary has been rather indecisive.
One-sided verdicts
In this climate of uncertainty, Dream11 managed to win two High Court verdicts in its favour. The speed with 💮which Justice Amit Rawal of Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by advocate Varun Gumber in April 2017 was startling. It dismissed Gumber’s petition saying that fantasy sports does not fall under gambling as it involves substantial skills. The order, allege lawyers in the know of things, was a “cut and paste” of the reply given by Dream11.
Two years later, Gurdeep Singh Sachar’s criminal public litigation in Bombay High Court was more serious in nature. It not only wanted the court to declare fantasy as a game of chance bu𝄹t that Dream11 was liable to pay GST at 28% instead of 18% that it had been paying since its operations began in 2012.
A division Bench of Justice Bharati H Dangre and Ranjit More speedily dismissed the petition without even waiting for the government of Maharashtra and Union government to file thei🐻r replies. Interestingly, Justice Rawal and Justice More are “in exile” after issues of integrity were raised against them. Industry insiders also allege that these petitions and the swift disposal of cases could be part of a Machiavellian gameplan.
Mehrotra’s SLP could come up for hearing next week. His petition, unlike previous ones, is stuffed with literature that argues why fantasy sports fall in the realm of gambling. In the courts, it’s virtually been one-way traffic for 🦹Dream11 so far. All eyes will be on Supreme Court once again as the online gaming industry, a more than 6,000 crore and growing business, begs for regulations that are clear and unambiguous.
