The Union Cabinet has cleared the implementation of the One Nation One Election proposal, aimed at synchronising Lok Sabha, state and local body elections. The proposal will now have to go before Parliament to be passed as a law. Since the implementation of One Nation One Election entails amendments to the Constitutionಌ, the law will have to be ratified by state Assemblies as well. The main Opposition Congress and other parties have earlier expressed their opposition to the proposal.
Earlier this month, reports citing unnamed sources had emerged that the Bharatiya Janata Party-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government will make 'One Nation, One Election' a reality in its current tenure. This follows Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day address last month in which he made a strong pitch for simultaneous polls, contending that frequent polls were creating hurdle﷽s to the country's progress๊.
"Definitely, it will be implemented in this tenure itself. It will be a reality," an official was quoted as sa꧅ying to news agency PTI, on condition of anonymity. Despite BJP being a minority, sources said that the cohesion within the ruling alliance, which completed its 100 days on Sunday, will continue for the rest of the tenure.
'One nation, one election' or simultaneous polls was a key promise made by the BJP during its campaign for the Lok Sabha elections. The government 🎃has also said that it has begun preparations for the delayed census exercise.
C🦩urrently, general, state and local body polls are out of sync, following timelines dictated by the terms of each individual elected body.
The idea of ONOE has been floated frequently in public gatherings and election rallies since 2014. In September last year, an eight-member committee was set up, headed by former President Ram Nath Kovind, to examine and make recommendations for holding simultaneous elections to the Lok Sabha, state Assemblies, m♏unicipalities and panchayats, keeping in view the existing constitutional framework.
Other members included Home Minister Amit Shah, former Leader of the Opposition in Rajya Sabha Ghulam Nabi Azad, former Finance Commission Chairman NK Singh, former Lok Sabha Secretary Gen💟eral Subhash Kashyap and senior advocate Harish Salve. Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal was a special invitee to the panel.
In March this year, the panel submitted its report on ONOE to 🀅President Droupadi Murmu and recommended that simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and state Assemblies be held as the first step, followed by synchronised local body polls within the next 100 days. The panel stated that the "loss of simultaneity in elections after the first two decades of India’s independence has had a baneful effect on the economy, polity and society."
Separately, the Law Commission is likely to recommend holding simultaneous polls for all three tiers of government — Lok Sabha, state assemblies and local bodies like municipalities and panchayats — starting with 2029 and a provision for a unity government in cases like a hung house or no-co🔯nfidence motion.
Threat to state powers?
BJP’s push for ONOE has received criticism from the Opposition and sections of society who think it will alter the functional value of Indian federalism. Its implem✱entation will require more than a dozen Constitutional amendments, most of which will not need ratification by the state assemblies.
For instance, the power to dissolve a state Assembly, according to Article 174, rests with the Governor who acts after he receives a ✱request from the Chief Minister. However, experts argue that with simultaneous polls, Assemblies will also have a fixed term and this could curtail the autonomy of states.
“In a parliamentary set-up, Chief Ministers have the power to dissolve an Assembly. If the states lose this provision, the prerogative of dissolving an Assembly will go to the PM, which will violate the basic principle of federalism,” said Balveer Arora, the author of India’s Beleaguered Federalism: The Pluralist Challenge, in an earlier report in Outlook.
In addition to this, simultaneous elections could also create lack of accountability of politicians once an election is over as frequent elections force them to remain visible to the public; it could influence voter behaviour, including a predisposition towards casting votes for the same political party at the national and state levels. This would especially be disadv🤡antageous to regional parties.
However, the government has given four reasons for implementing ONOE – cost saving, reducing the burden on the administrative set-up and security forces, undeterred implementation of government policies, and ensuring more developmental work by administrative machinery r🐷ather than focusing on continuous electioneering.
This is not the first time that the idea of ONOE has been floated. In 1999, the Law Commission, led by B P Jeevan Reddy, had recommended simultaneous elections. In 2015, a parlia🐈mentary standing committee reintroduced the recommendations and in 2016, PM Modi voiced his support for the idea. On August 30, 2018, the Law Commission, chai♕red by Justice B S Chauhan, released the draft report recommending simultaneous elections.
