National

Supreme Court Snubs Centre Over Query On Same-Sex Marriage

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud questioned where the degrees of these prohibited relationships come from and if they are from the Hindu law. Sagothra and Sapinda- that is now codified, the rep🌟ort said.

Supreme Court
info_icon

The Cen🌸tre on Thursday told Supreme Court that a green signal to same se🌺x marriage in India may give people license challenge the bar on other socially unaccepted relationships including incest.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta presented a hypothetical situation to the court where a man might argue that he is attracted to his sister,𝓡 claim his right of choice and challenge𝓰 the taboo on incest, according to the report in NDTV.

"Kindly visualise this - from the very beginning I am atꩲtracted to those persons who are mentioned in t♕he degree of prohibited relationships. Incest is not uncommon but it is prohibited worldwide," Mehta was quoted in the report as having said.

"I am attracted to my sister... We are consenting adults entering into activities within privacy. And we claim our right of autꦗonomy, right of choice... based on that, can someone not challenge that why this restriction?" he added.

“Jus𓂃tice Chandrachud questioned where the degrees of these prohibited relationships come from and if they are from the Hindu law.  Sagothra and Sapinda- that is now codified,"; Mehta was quoted in the report as having said.

The judges, however, said the situation posited by the Solicitor General is "far-fetched" and that there are certain "universal rules" where the 💯state interest in personal relationships is legitimate, said the report.

The Centre also appeared to be under the impression that the pe😼titioners seeking legali𒁃sation of gay marriage were arguing that sexual orientation is a matter of choice, it said.

The representative was set right by Justice Chan๊drachuꦍd, it stated.

";They say sexual orientation is given to me. They say that I'm entitled to my autonomy by virtue of my sexual orientation. Sexual orientation is not a matter of choice but a mat♚ter of immutable features🗹- that's the argument," Justice Chandrachud was quoted as having said.

The Centre had earlier questioned if the court can give legal sanction to same sex marriage, arguing that it is the domain of legislature.