The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Centre to provide information about the numbers and names reiterated by the apex court Collegium for appointment as judges in higher judiciary with reasons why they were not considered so far and at what level 🎃they were pending.
The direction was passed by a bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud while hearing a PIL seeking a direction that a time limit be fixed for the Centre to notify the appointment of judges recommended by the Supreme Court Collegium.
"The Supreme Court Collegium is not a search committee (for judges) whose recommendations can be stalled," said the bench which also compris𒉰ed Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra.
The bench asked Attorney General (AG) R Venkataramani, appearing for the Centre, to provide it with a list of names reiterated by𒐪 the Collegium and say "why they are pending and at what level".
"If you can please make a list of the names reiterated and why it is pending and at what level 😼it is pending... Show us why it is pending," the CJI said.
The bench said s🔜ome appointm𝓀ents are now in the pipeline and "we expect it to come very early". It then adjourned the hearing on the PIL, taking into account the request for postponement by the attorney general.
The PIL was filed by advocate Harsh Vibh🅠ore Singhal.
The plea has also sought a direction to plug the 'zone of twilight' of there being no time for notifying the Collegium's recommendations for the appointm🎀ent of judges to the higher judiciary.
The plea said that in the absence of a fixed period, "the government arbitrarily delays notifying appointments thereby trampling upon judicial indep🍬endence, imperilling the constitutional and democratic order and disparaging the majesty and sagacity of the court".
Lawyer Prashant Bhushan referred to the name of senior advocate Saurabh Kirpal, who has not been appointed as a high court judge despite reiteratioไn by the apex court🐟 Collegium.
