Amid the ongoing🐠 controversy regarding the ordinance on control of services in Delhi, the Centre on Monday told the Supreme Court that the 🎶ordinance was promulgated as officers working in the vigilance department were "targeted" by the city government, and bureaucrats and officials were humiliated.
On May 11, ▨a five-judge constitution bench of the apex court had said the Delhi government has legislative a🌳nd executive powers over administration of services except for public order, police and land.
Follwoing this decision, Centre had on May 19 promulgated the Government of 𒐪National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Ordinance, 2023, in a bid to create an authority for transfer and posting of Group-A officers in Delhi.
Centre files an affifdavit
Launching a scathing attack on the Aam Admi Party (AAP)-led Delhi Government, the Centre claimed in an affidavit that after the May 11 judgement of the constitution bench of the top court, ministers in the Delhi government started a "witch-hunt&quo🉐t; and harassment of officers to influence their decision making.
"To elaborate the above, the officers working in the vigilance department, that is the department which handles se𒆙rious vigilance issues relating to complaints of corruption, thus involving, criminal and other politically sensitive cases, came to be specifically targeted by the elected government," the Centre said in its affidavit.
The Centre also brought it t👍o the apex court's notice that complaints were received from Special Secretary (Vigilance) and two other officers, pointing out a serious incident of trespassing in the said officer's chamber and taking unlawful custody of certain files.
The affidavit further said, "However, the elected government remained arrogant to the official duties of the officers concerned and handled the whole affair in a highly insensitive manner, as evinced from their act and conduct of repeatedly insultingও and humiliating the senior officers as well as the subordinate officers o💫f the vigilance department."
It said the files of the vigilance department were "extremely sensitive" in nature and included those relating to al꧒leged excise scam, expenditure incurred in the construction of new residential bungalow of the chief minister and also those containing documents pertaining to advertisements given by and from the exchequer of the Delhi government for a poli๊tical party.
According to the Centre, the ordinance satisfies the existing constitutional scheme of governance of NCT of Delhi pr☂ovided under Article 239 read with 239AA of the Constitution.
The affidavit also𝓡 has it mentioned that immediately after the pronouncement of May 11 judgment by the apex court, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal had met the Lieutenant Governor and the LG had specially informed him that the verdict is sacrosanct for him and should be♛ followed in letter and spirit.
"Despite this, the chief minister and other ministers in a 𓃲dramatic and convoluted fashion, immediately went on a rampage by issuing orders and posting them on social media, which are in gross disregard to the rules and procedure already in place with regard to administrative mechanism of the civil service board….," it said.
"The ministers started uploading the orders on social media platforms and making statements in ꦅmedia and started a witch-hunt, harassment🔜 of officers, media trials, threats and street postures to influence the decision making by the officers," it added.
While hearing the matter on Monday, a bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud hinted that it was contemplating referring to a constitution bench for adjudication of the Delhi goverཧnment's petition against the Centre's recent ordinance on the control of services.
Recently notices have been issued Centre and the lieutenant governor by the Supreme Court on the ple🦩a while refusing to grant an interim stay on the ordinance on control over services in Delhi.
Delhi vs Centre: The ordinance row so far
Aam Aadmi Party 🌠(AAP) government had termed the promulgation of the ordinance by the Centre a "deception" with the Supreme Court verdict on control of services.
Centre promulgated the o🦋rdinance seeking the set up of a National Capital Civil Service Authority for transf✃er of and disciplinary proceedings against Group-A officers from the Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar, Lakshadweep, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli (Civil) Services (DANICS) cadre.
The chief minister is one of the three members of the Authority, while two others are bureaucrats. The decisions by the Authority are to be taken by a majority and, in the event of🍒 a dispute, the matter will be referred to the LG whose decision will be final.
Before the May 11 top court verdict, the transfer and 𝐆posting of all officers of the Del🌊hi government were under the executive control of the LG.
