A group of former civil servants have written an open letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressing dismay over the central vista redevelopment project, which, they alleged, has been "marked by a degree of executive hi🐼ghhandedness" from its very inception.
The 69 retired bureaucrats, under the aegis of Constitutional Conduct Group, 🌄claimed that the country's public health infrastructure was crying out for inv🅺estment and asked why this "wasteful and unnecessary project must take precedence over social priorities like health and education".
The signatories included former IAS✱ o🐬fficers Jawhar Sircar, Jawed Usmani, N C Saxena, Aruna Roy, Harsh Mander and Rahul Khullar, and former IPS officers A S Dulat, Amitabh Mathur and Julio Ribeiro.
"Notwithstanding the specious reasoning as to why a new Parliament building is at all necessary, it is a matter of great dismay that at a timeﷺ when we are faced with an economy in perilous decline and a pandemic which has brough🌞t untold misery to millions, the government has chosen to invest vast sums on a project which represents nothing but the pursuit of pomp and grandeur," they said.
The central vista redevelopment project in the heart of the national capital envisages construction of a new Parliament complex, government buildings for central ministries, a new enclave for the vi🌼ce president and a new prime minister's office and residence among others.
The Central Public Works Department (CPWD), which is executing the proj🅰ect, has revised its estimated cost from Rs♏ 11,794 crore to Rs 13,450 crore.
"We are writing to you today to convey our dismay at the manner in which your government, and y𓆏ou, as its head, have chosen to completely disregard the rule of law in the matter of the Central Vista Redevelopment project. 💖This project, from its very inception, has been marked by a degree of executive highhandedness rarely witnessed before," alleged the letter.
"Of particular concern i𝔍s the manner in which environmental clearances were obtained for a plan which treats the green spaces and the built heritage of the central vista as an unnecessary hurdle to the achievement of objectives driven by monumental ambition," it further alleged.
The former civil servants also won🦄dered what locus standi the Prime Minister has to lay the foundation stone of the Parliament building.
"The Prime Minister is the head of the executive, not of the legislature. For a building that will accommodate the two Houses of Parliament, the appropriate protocol would have been for the President of India to lay the foundation stone. This was a clear instance of breach of constitutional propriety," the l🎶etter alleged.
Modi had on December 10♎ laid the foundation stone of the new Par𝔍liament building.
The signatories also alleged "brazen impropriety" in going ahead with the construction of the ne﷽w Parliament building while the matter is still sub judice.
