National

Ayodhya Mosque Illegal Under Shariat Law: AIMPLB's Zafaryab Jilani

Athar Hussain, the secretary of a trust 🔥formed to build the mosque in Ayodhya, however, said everyone interprets the Shariat in their own way.

Ayodhya Mosque Illegal Under Shariat Law: AIMPLB's Zafaryab Jilani
info_icon

All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) member Zafaryab Jilani said on Wednesday the mosque which is planned to come up in Ayodhya foll🐲owing last year's Supreme Court verdict is against the Waqf Act and ♛"illegal" under the Shariat laws.

Athar Hussain, the secretary of a trust formed to build the mosque in Ayodhya, however, said everyღone interprets the Shariat in their own way and when the land has been allotted under the directive of the Supreme Court, it cannot be illegal.

The blueprint of the mosque and a hospital 𒐪to be built on a five-acre land in Ayodhya's Dhannipur village was unveiled on Saturday at the Indo-Islamic Cultural Fꦜoundation (IICF) office in Lucknow.

The IICF has been formed by t♐he Uttar Pradesh State S🀅unni Central Waqf Board to construct the mosque and other utilities on the plot.

"According to the Waqf Act, mosques or land of mosques cannot be bartered. The proposed mosque in Ayodhya violates the Act. It violates the Shariat law as the Waqf Act is based on the Shariat," said Jilan💝i, who was also the convenor of the Babri Masjid Action Committee.

Another executive member of AIMPLB SQR Ilyas said, "We have rejected th💎e proposal to accept land for the mosque at a♍ny other place. We lost the title suit and so we don't need a land for a mosque."

He alleged that the Sunni Central Waqf Board was working under the pressure of the go🦂ve🔥rnment.

"The Muslims have, however, rejected this land at Dhannipur given in compens🌼ation. The mosque being built by the trust constituted by the Sunni Central Waqf Board is just a symbolic one."

The i🤡ssue was raised by MP MP Asaduddin Owaisi at a meeting of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board's executive committee heldꦍ on October 13. All the members were of the view that the exchange of land for the mosque was not permissible under the Waqf Act and in turn "illegal" under the Shariat law.

"The power for interpretation of Shariya does not lie in the ⭕hands of 𓂃some limited people. The mosque is the place for offering namaz. So what is wrong if we are building a mosque?" posed Hussain.

The Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid disputed structure was demolished in December 1992 by "kar sevaks" who claimed that the mosquไe in Ayodhya was built by demolishing an ancient Ram temple.

After a ꧂protracted legal tussle, the Supreme Court, on November 9 last year, ruled in favour of the construction of a Ram temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya and directed the Centre to allot an alternative five-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board for building a new mosque at a "prominent" place in the holy town in Uttar Pradesh.

On the directive 🍸of t🌱he apex court, the Uttar Pradesh government allotted the five-acre plot in Ayodhya's Dhannipur for the construction of the mosque.