National

Delhi HC Orders Removal Of Posts On UPSC Qualification Of Om Birla's Daughter

Justice Navin Chawla of the Delhi HC heard the matter and ordered th𒈔e rꦺemoval of social media posts against Anjali.

IRPS officer and LS Speaker Om Birlas daughter Anjali Birla |
IRPS officer and LS Speaker Om Birla's daughter Anjali Birla | Photo: X/@GetNewsd
info_icon

Daughter of Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and an Indian Railway Personnel Service (IRPS) officer, Anjali Birla, filed a defamation suit in th🦋e Delhi High Court against social media posts alleging that she passed the UPSC Civil Services examination due o her father's influence.

In her plea, she has so♒ught the removal of all these social media posts that have 'falsely alleged' that she passed the exams on her firs﷽t attempt due to Om Birla's influence.

Anjali's counsel Rajiv Nayar had mentioned the plea 🦩for an urgent listing before the HC.

Justice Navin Chawla of the Delhi HC heard the ma🐻tter and ordered tཧhe removal of social media posts against Anjali.

The High Court directed X, Google Inc to remove defamatory social media posts against IRPS officer and Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla's dꦦaughter Anjali. It restrained unknown parties from p🎉osting, circulating defamatory content against her.

Anjali had contended that the posts on social media were "misleading" and "defamatory", further allꦯeging that spreading of such allegations with no basis of truth, was aimed at tarnishing her reputation. She said tha🤪t these claims stand through false narratives.

Based on the assertions, Anjali Birla -- the suit said -- believes that the defamation 🌃suit will be successful.

"The false and baseless allegations being disseminated in a brazen manner indicate clear intentions to unlawfully damage plaintiff's reputation and standing through defamatory narratives. Based on this assertion alone, the plaintiff believes that the current lawsuit should success on its merits," the suit was cited by Times of India.

News agency ANI citing sources said that people were posting these false claims about Anjali as a means to create controversy for 💯the Modi government.

Anjali's suit also seeks the prevention of damaging Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla's reputation by the defendant🥃s.

Reportedly, the defendants in this suit are Ministry of E😼lectronics and Information Te𒐪chnology, Google Inc, X Corp (formerly known as Twitter) and John Doe (an unnamed party).

Anjali filed her suit before the Maharashtra Cyber Cell's Inspector General of Police against X handle of “Dhruv Rathee (Parody)” and various other accounts under Sections 78,79,318(2), 352, 356(2), 353(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita Act, 2023 along with section 66 (C) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Live Law reported.

On July 5, an FIR wa🌳s also registered under Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Sections 78, 79, 318(2), 352, 356(2), 353(2) and 3(5) along with the section 66(C) of the IT Act.