Gay sex amongđ¸ consenting adults is not a criminal offence, the Supreme Court unanimoꌥusly ruled on Thursday.
An explainer on the law đthat many see as a đ relic of the British era.
Gay sex amongđ¸ consenting adults is not a criminal offence, the Supreme Court unanimoꌥusly ruled on Thursday.
The top court decriminaliđsed part of the Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code that criminalises consensual gay sex, saying it was irrational, indefensible and manifestly arbitrary.
A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra unanimously
held thŕŚat the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trađ´nsgender and Queer (LGBTQ) community possess the same constitutional rights as other citizens of the country.
We bring to you an explainer on tࡴhe law that many seeđˇ as a relic of the British era.
1.     Section 377 came into force in 1862. It says that âWhoever voluntarily has carnal interÂcourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of eitđher description for a term whđich may extend to 10 years, and shall also be liable to fine.â
2.     After years of legal battle, the Delhi High Court in July 2009 de-criminalised consensual homosexual acts in private by declaring as unconstitutional a part of Section 377 of IPC that criminalises unnatural sex. The court said âthe section denies aâ gay person a right to full personhoodâŚâ
3.     However, in December 2013, the Supreme Court setđ aside the HC verdict. Justice GS Singhvi (since retired) upheld the constitutional validity of Section 377 and said it was for the legislature to take a call on the controversial provision.
4.     Under 377, consensuaâl sexual acts of adults such as oral and anal sex in private between heterosexuals also are currently treated as unnatural and punishable.
5.     The Supreme Court held out hope for the LGBT community when in April 2014, the top court directed the government to declare transgenders a âthird genderâ and include ęŚthem in the OBC quota. The court said they should have all rights under law, including mađ°rriage, adoption, divorce, succession and inheritance.
6.     In February 2016, a curative petition was submitted by Naz Foundation ཧand the then Chief Justice of India, T.S. Thakur decidedđ that the petitions will be reviewed again by a constitutional bench consisting of five members.
7.     Gender râights activists say that Section 377 violates different articles of the Indian Constitution -- Article 14 which guarantees equality before law to all individuals; Article 15 which ensures that no person shall be discriminated against on the basis of caste, gender, creed etc and Article 21 which ensures the right of life and liberty to all the citizens of the country.