In the high court, Sisodia ch♓allenged a trial court’s April 30 order by which his bail petitions were dismissed on the ground that the stage was not right for granting bail to Sisodia.
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday granted more time to the ED and the CBI to file their replies to former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia's pleas seeking bail in the corruption andﷺ money-laundering cases lodged by the agencies in relation to the alleged excise policy scam.
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, who had on May 3 issued notices to the two agencies asking them to file their rep𝓡lies to the pleas and listed the matter for hearing on Wednesday, was informed by the counsel for the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) that they need some more time to respond.
The request made by the agencies’ lawyers was opposed by Sisodia’s counsel who said he has bไeen incarcerated and the ED and the CBI had assured the Supreme Court that the trial will be completed in six months.
The high court dictated its order saying, “Respondents seek more time to file a reply. It is stated that the ED is in the process oℱf filing another prosecution comp♎laint in relation to a co-accused in the case”.
“Irrespective of that, the accused is in custody, and four more days are granted to the r𒅌espondents to fi❀le their replies. The reply be placed on court record by Monday and an advance copy is also supplied to the other side by Monday,” the court further said and listed the matter for hearing on May 14.
At the outset, the ED’s counsel submitted ꦰthat he had filed an application seeking one week to file its reply to the petition.
He said the investigating officer 🐟is "neck-d𒀰eep" in the investigation and they are also in the process of filing a supplementary prosecution complaint (charge sheet) in the case. He said the officers were also busy in the hearing of the case in the Supreme Court.
The counsel for the CBI also urged the court to 𝓀grant a week for the agency to file a reply.
In the high court,🐈 Sisodia challenged a trial court’s April 30 order by which his bail pe🎐titions were dismissed on the ground that the stage was not right for granting bail to Sisodia.
The high court had continued the interim relief earlier granted to Sisodia by thꦑe trial court to meet his ailing wife once a week in custody during the pendency of the pleas.
The trial court dismissed Sisodia's bail pleas in the corruption and money-laundering cases lodged by the CBI and ED respectively in connection with alleged irregularities in the for💃mulation and execution of the now-scrapped Delhi excise policy for 2021-22.
The beneficiaries diverted "illegal" gains to the accused officials and made false entries in their books of account to evade detection꧑, the probe agencies have alleged.
According to the CBI and ED, which are probing the cases against Sis𝓀odia, irregularities were committed while modifying the excise policy and undue favours extended to the licence holders.
In the April 30 order, the special judge denied the relief, saying the stage was not right for granting bail to Sisod♏ia.
The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader was arrested by the CBI on February 26, 2023, for his alleged role in the "scam". The ED arrested the former deputy chief minister in a money-laundering case stemming from the CBI FIR on Ma🏅rch 9, 2023.
Sisodia resigned 💙from the Delhi cabiꦺnet on February 28, 2023.
The high court had dismissed Sisodia's bail pleas in the CBI and the ED cases on May 30 and July 3 las༒t year.
On October 30, 2023, the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the high court's order, saying the allegation levelled by the pಞrobe agencies that "windfall gains" of Rs 338 crore were made by a few wholesale liquor distributors was "tentatively supported" by material and evidence.
The Delhi government implemented the policy on Novemb🌠er 17, 2021, but scrapped it at the end of September 2022 amid allegations of corruption.